Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > Interesting. Perhaps you should make your concerns known to anyone that > will be implementing KoPeR then: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating/KojiPersonalRepos Restricting KoPeR isn't really going to prevent anybody from setting up a third-party repository. They can already do that on the openSUSE Build Service (which supports Fedora targets), on fedorapeople.org (if their repository is small enough for the quota there) or on their own infrastructure (for example, repo.calcforge.org runs off a VPS, and my "build system" is a laptop). It just will make them not use KoPeR. Packages built on the openSUSE Build Service consistently contain SUSEisms, which the Build Service appears to hack support for into their Fedora buildroots, or outright buildserviceisms, e.g. %{?fedora_version} instead of %{?fedora}. So I'm not sure denying the use of KoPeR to some of the interested parties is going to improve overall packaging quality. At least packages in KoPeR are guaranteed to be buildable with Koji. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
