Adam Tkac wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:50:31AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Actually, upstream of libjpeg *is* active, he's just not communicating >> that fact. I made an attempt to re-ignite activity there and get >> several common patches applied, and had buy-in from Tom Lane, the RH >> libjpeg maintainer, and the majority of the SF.net libjpeg project team. >> Guido Vollbeding is apparently working on a new release, but isn't being >> particularly communicative or transparent about it. If you want to >> review or join the discussion, see the SF.net libjpeg list. > > Thanks for info. I'm going to discuss future of TigerVNC enhancements > there. > Would you like a bug report to track getting the changes out of tigervnc and merged into libjpeg or are you planning to revert to system libjpeg while waiting for the changes to be merged to libjpeg? -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
