Am So, den 04.07.2004 schrieb Michael Schwendt um 0:42: > Without consideration of the current priority values, from the many > packages in the http://fedora.us/QA listing, which ones should be > processed first? Any wishlist items, anyone? I think we should look at the whole process of building external kernel-modules 2.6 -- some bugs at fedora.us and livna.org depend on this. Especially I'd like to hear something on the problem you can see in http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1709 Thomas and I have a little dispute how things should work and it would be very nice to hear something from someone like you. At least to know a direction. ;-) Thanks. After that we could look at the kernel-module-build-environment Thomas created; See http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1019 . Ville did only a short look AFAIK and I also could not look closer until today. I did and hackish update some evenings ago to fedora-kmodhelper (merely a proof of concept) so it works in 2.4 and in 2.6 -- but It still needs some testing and cleanup. http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/MISC/fedora-kmodhelper BTW: Michael, thanks for all your QA work @fedora.us CU thl
