On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 10:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > > > > Rahul, > > > > What's the policy on having the URL for both this thread and the other > > incredibly long thread regarding that that appeared shortly after > > f11-alpha including in the release notes, so that people can go and read > > these threads, realize that (in almost every case) there point of view > > regarding this has already been presented and that this is how it will > > be? > > > > I'm figuring that something should be attempted so that we don't have to > > go through this conversation a third time when f11 is released. ;-] > > I don't think it is appropriate content for release notes since it isn't > useful to lead users to read a few threads with hundreds of mails in > that context. Fedora release notes is not Fedora Weekly News. I'm not suggesting that you put all these threads into the release notes, just a url so that hopefully people will read the discussion already had (and then hopefully avoid having the same fruitless convesation again). R. -- "It's a fine line between denial and faith. It's much better on my side" -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
