Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 14:17 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:13:11 +0100, Christoph wrote: > > > Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 09:36 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > > > > > > I wonder why this spec file creates a virtual -devel subpackage with a > > > lower Epoch and higher version > > > > because of the downgrade > > Let me rephrase: > > Previous package build: 0.36-1 > This update: 1:0.22-2 > > Why is the -devel subpackage 0:0.35 as I quoted? > > The 0.36-1 release already did: > > Obsoletes: libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel < 0.35 > Provides: libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel = 0.35 > > With a downgrade to 1:0.22, -devel goes from 0.35 to 0:0.35? > (no Epoch and explicit zero Epoch doesn't make a different, btw) You are correct, I did not look closely enough. This is nonsense. > > > and why there is no API for that -devel > > > pkg included? > > > > because the maintainer has dropped the -devel package again. > > Why the "Provides" then? Most likely because of a bad interpretation of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
