On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:01:42 +0100, Christoph wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 26.03.2009, 13:28 +0000 schrieb Andreas Bierfert: > > Author: awjb > > > > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/libopensync-plugin-evolution2/devel > > In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2309 > > > > Modified Files: > > .cvsignore libopensync-plugin-evolution2.spec sources > > Log Message: > > - downgrade > > > [...] > > > > %changelog > > -* Wed Feb 25 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 0.36-2 > > -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild > > +* Tue Feb 10 2009 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> > > +- 1:0.22-2 > > +- use versioned provides/requires/obsoletes > > +- cleanup > > + > > +* Sat Feb 07 2009 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> > > +- 1:0.22-1 > > +- downgrade (#474070) > > > > * Fri Jun 20 2008 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> > > - 0.36-1 > > Why did you wipe the changelog instead of merging the previous entries? > And why did you switch the style of changelog entries between 0.35 and > 0.36? And why the versioned BuildRequires? It's ok for Requires, but an > Epoch for BuildRequires seems wrong to me. I wonder why this spec file creates a virtual -devel subpackage with a lower Epoch and higher version and why there is no API for that -devel pkg included? | Name: libopensync-plugin-evolution2 | Epoch: 1 | Version: 0.22 | BuildRequires: libopensync-devel = 1:0.22 | BuildRequires: evolution-data-server-devel | Obsoletes: libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel < 0:0.35 | Provides: libopensync-plugin-evolution2-devel = 0:0.35 | %install | [...] | rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_includedir} | %files | %defattr(-,root,root,-) | %doc COPYING README ChangeLog | %{_libdir}/opensync/plugins/evo2_sync.so | %{_datadir}/opensync/defaults/evo2-sync -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
