Alan Dunn wrote: > I would like to use PPL 0.10 in packages for F9 and (more importantly) > F10, and have been directed to ask whether anyone else minds this > change. It is currently only in rawhide. It does require an soname > bump (libppl.so.6 -> libppl.so.7), however, it appears that the only > packages that rely on this are the subpackages of the package itself. In that case (and Alex Lancaster's repoquery confirmed it) there's no problem whatsoever with just upgrading it. > Upstream has merely to submit the change as an update (and would also > like to do so: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463742). Tell them to go ahead. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
