>>>>> "AD" == Alan Dunn writes: AD> I would like to use PPL 0.10 in packages for F9 and (more importantly) AD> F10, and have been directed to ask whether anyone else minds this AD> change. It is currently only in rawhide. It does require an soname AD> bump (libppl.so.6 -> libppl.so.7), however, it appears that the only AD> packages that rely on this are the subpackages of the package itself. AD> Upstream has merely to submit the change as an update (and would also AD> like to do so: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463742). Looks like only ppl does depend on that soname: # repoquery --recursive --alldeps --whatrequires libppl.so.6 ppl-static-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-yap-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-gprolog-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-gprolog-static-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-utils-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-devel-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-docs-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-yap-static-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-swiprolog-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 ppl-swiprolog-static-0:0.9-25.fc10.i386 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
