Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Actually, I feel s-c-network should be revived and NetworkManager be
made strictly optional.
I'd actually have to disagree. I *love* NM on my Asus (netbook). It's
great for laptops (or other computers that tend to move around and need
to deal with "foreign" networks, especially wireless networks), and it's
"okay" for desktops. (For one, it handles Verizon CDMA modems out of the
box, much better even that on Windoze, which is why I'd much rather use
NM when dealing with one of those.) However, it's not yet up-to-snuff
(and possibly inferior) for servers or other "complicated" network
setups, and it's maybe at "break even" for static setups.
I think we /should/ be pushing NM for "normal" use so it gets exposure
and improves, but I agree that s-c-n and the if-scripts toolchains need
to be maintained (at least for now) as they are still superior for some
situations.
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
,= ,-_-. =. Freedom to Use
((_/)o o(\_)) Freedom to Examine
`-'(. .)`-' Freedom to Share
\_/ Freedom to Improve
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
