Am Samstag, den 21.03.2009, 17:40 -0500 schrieb Mike Chambers: > On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 17:32 +0100, nodata wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 21.03.2009, 11:44 -0400 schrieb Seth Vidal: > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, nodata wrote: > > > > > > > > My problem was that the list of dependencies included yum, and since rpm > > > > was broken, removing yum would have left me in a bad state. > > > > > > > > I think the F10->rawhide update instructions are wrong. yum update yum > > > > then yum update did not work. > > > > > > Those aren't the instructions that I've seen: > > > > > > f10->rawhide: > > > > > > yum update rpm > > > > > > yum update > > > > > > -sv > > > > > > > Sorry, yum update yum, yum update. > > NO, like jesse stated.. > > 1 - With F10 enabled ONLY, yum update rpm (latest rpm in F10 updates)... As I said, F10 was already up-to-date. > > 2 - Enable rawhide and then just "yum update" > > THAT'S IT!! updating rawhide includes an update to yum. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
