Am Samstag, den 21.03.2009, 10:30 -0500 schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 15:29:20 +0100, > nodata <lsof@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 21.03.2009, 09:28 -0500 schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 23:18:13 +0100, > > > nodata <lsof@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > and I can't do a yum localinstall > > > > rpm-libs-4.7.0-0.beta1.3.fc11.x86_64.rpm due to this: > > > > warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: NOKEY, key > > > > ID d22e77f2 > > > > > > > > > > > > Public key for rpm-libs-4.7.0-0.beta1.3.fc11.x86_64.rpm is not installed > > > > > > --nogpgcheck will work around that. > > > > But then I got caught again by the audit-libs arch dependencies.. ugh. > > What I have done to get around conflicts with updates in some situations is > yum erase followed by yum install. As long as the list of dependencies doesn't > include anything you can't do without for the duration of the erase and > reinstall, this will solve some problems that can be hard to work around. > Sometimes I have to leave things that are part of a broken dependency > uninstalled in order to be able to update other stuff. I have a list of > stuff like this and test reinstalling them after getting a new set of > rawhide updates. My problem was that the list of dependencies included yum, and since rpm was broken, removing yum would have left me in a bad state. I think the F10->rawhide update instructions are wrong. yum update yum then yum update did not work. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
