>>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: TC> If there is not a clear rpm dependency between a subpackage TC> (e.g. foo-devel Requires: foo) and the package which contains the TC> License text, and the license text contains a requirement that it TC> be distributed along with all binaries, then and only then is it TC> acceptable to duplicate the License text in multiple subpackages, TC> with the caveat that it should be in the SAME location in each TC> subpackage. Well, in that case I must apologize for those reviews I've done. I would swear that I had requested an opinion on directly this issue (even the more specific case where there is no link in name or dependency between the various packages generated from one src.rpm) and was told that it was sufficient to include the license text exactly once. That's the advice I've been going on for some time, and the guidance I used when voting on the guideline restricting duplicates. Oh, well. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
