On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "KK" == Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > KK> This really needs a guideline. > > It already is. Is the existing guideline somehow unclear? We tried > to write it as clearly as possible. "A Fedora package must not list a > file more than once in the spec file's %files listings." Where does > that leave room for doubt about license files? The packaging guidelines are clear, but also we might be breaking the law by distributing binary packages (RPMs) without license files. It sounds like the packaging guidelines may need to be modified. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
