Re: Experience and observations of F11a/rawhide so far

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:14 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> 
> > It also won't be an issue when updating from F10 to F11, as long as you
> > update F10 first (a compatible rpm was shipped as an F10 update). It'll
> > also be OK from Beta onwards, as you say. Only Alpha -> 11 or
> > non-updated 10 -> 11 via yum will be affected.
> 
> Has this updated rpm for F10 already been pushed?  Cause I am sure I
> tried an F10 to rawhide (as of couple days ago) update via yum and i got
> those same md5/checksum errors as well.

>From the discussion on this list, yes, it's supposed to have been
released already. Was it a *fully up to date* F10 that you tried to
upgrade?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux