Re: Experience and observations of F11a/rawhide so far

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> It also won't be an issue when updating from F10 to F11, as long as you
> update F10 first (a compatible rpm was shipped as an F10 update). It'll
> also be OK from Beta onwards, as you say. Only Alpha -> 11 or
> non-updated 10 -> 11 via yum will be affected.

Has this updated rpm for F10 already been pushed?  Cause I am sure I
tried an F10 to rawhide (as of couple days ago) update via yum and i got
those same md5/checksum errors as well.

-- 
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY

Fedora Project - Bugzapper, tester, user, etc..
miketc302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux