On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:53 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Masters (jcm@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > My point (as others made) is that making these files is completely > > useless. I'm not saying "overwrite the user's files" I'm saying ideally > > don't make the useless additional files on upgrade. > > rpm already has code to avoid making them when they're useless. It's > just being defeated by the sha256 code for the first upgrade to > rawhide/F11. So why aren't we putting both old and new hashes in the .rpm, for at least the duration of F11, so that we don't have this problem? RPM could then fall back on the old hashes for the purpose of detecting file modification if that's all that's in the existing RPM db.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
