Re: PLEASE READ: provenpackager reseed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:03:00PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:57:31 +0100, Patrice wrote:
> 
> > Maybe things have changed, but my understanding was that provenpackager
> > would be the "Experienced packagers" referred to on:
> > 
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/WhoIsAllowedToModifyWhichPackages
> > 
> > which also lays out what provenpackagers are allowed to do.
> 
> =:-o  1st of April is still weeks away.
> 
> Why is there an exception for "Red Hat packagers"?
> 
> | Definition of the term "Experienced packagers" 
> |
> | [...]
> |
> | Red Hat packagers that have been through a number of reviews and
> | have been packagers for more than 4 months. 

It was added at that time to include experienced Red Hat packagers 
coming from core who weren't sponsors. Now Red Hat packagers in that
position should be provenpackagers.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux