On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 18:00, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:58:56 +0200, Rudi Chiarito wrote: > At fedora.us, further QA policy changes are in the queue. One which allows > for new packages to enter the "unstable" repository after a very basic > review (in particular the security relevant checks) and then hope that the > community reports any missing flaws. But even then, the packagers ought to > make sure their packages build at least on all the target platforms and > adhere to the packaging guidelines, too. The packagers themselves should > do a good portion of the QA for their packages. For instance, there is > documentation on how to use 'fedora-rmdevelrpms' or 'mach' to find missing > build dependencies. And there are several other packaging topics covered > in the Wiki, too. Which btw reminds me, is where can I get a mach configurations for FC2 ?
