On Friday 06 March 2009, Paul Howarth wrote: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > rpmlint warns about this (spurious-executable-perm). But I think rpmlint > > is wrong. > > > > There are scant guidelines about this - just one oblique reference in > > a "packaging mistakes" page. There is no convincing explanation I can > > find as to why including an executable script in documentation is a > > bad thing. > > They sometimes pull in additional dependencies. FWIW, rpmlint has a separate "doc-file-dependency" check for that. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
