Re: Executable example scripts in documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 06 March 2009, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > rpmlint warns about this (spurious-executable-perm).  But I think rpmlint
> > is wrong.
> >
> > There are scant guidelines about this - just one oblique reference in
> > a "packaging mistakes" page.  There is no convincing explanation I can
> > find as to why including an executable script in documentation is a
> > bad thing.
>
> They sometimes pull in additional dependencies.

FWIW, rpmlint has a separate "doc-file-dependency" check for that.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux