https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487527#c3 The above review is blocked because I want to include three example scripts in the documentation, and I want them to be executable so that people can run them without an unnecessary extra step. rpmlint warns about this (spurious-executable-perm). But I think rpmlint is wrong. There are scant guidelines about this - just one oblique reference in a "packaging mistakes" page. There is no convincing explanation I can find as to why including an executable script in documentation is a bad thing. We also have lots of executable examples already, and quite rightly so: find /usr/share/doc/ -perm /111 -a \! -type d Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
