Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I wanted a new name for this project that doesn't involve using > trademarks and doesn't carry the baggage of "MinGW", and also reflects > the fact that we might want to broaden support to other non-embedded > platforms in future. > > So far my best effort was "Consumer cross-compilers" (CCC) or > "Consumer cross-compiler collection" (CCCC). What I wonder is: should there not be one group per target operating system? While I can see the sense of bundling W32 and W64 together (but still wonder whether users won't prefer them separate), let's assume there was a legal way to build a cross compiler for OS X (AFAIK, there currently is none, unless you limit yourself to the base Darwin only): would people really want to install the MinGW stuff when all they care about is OS X or the opposite? Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list