On Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:41:38 -0500, James wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 09:55 +0000, Bill Crawford wrote:
> > On Friday 06 March 2009 09:44:00 Bill Crawford wrote:
> > > I just noticed an interesting thing with yum-builddep. There's a dependency
> > > somewhere on audit-libs-devel, and it's trying to pull in audit-libs.i386
> > > instead of .x64_64 ... this then leads to it wanting to download over a
> > > dozen other i386 packages. Any way to get around this? Did I do something
> > > wrong?
> >
> > Never mind, I'd forgotten to enable / disable some repositories (although I'm
> > still ... disturbed ... that i?86 packages can satisfy the dependencies for a
> > x86-64 -devel package :-/).
>
> Log a bug against audit to use:
>
> BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel%{_isa}
>
> ...which will mean the requires provider must be the same arch. as the
> requesting pkg.
Are you sure? Probably you meant "Requires" instead of "BuildRequires",
but even then, there are automatic x86_64-specific SONAME dependencies
already: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1075605
If this needs to be done for audit-libs-devel, that implies we would
need to do it also for all other -devel packages.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
