Paul Howarth píše v Pá 06. 03. 2009 v 10:34 +0000: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487527#c3 > > > > The above review is blocked because I want to include three example > > scripts in the documentation, and I want them to be executable so that > > people can run them without an unnecessary extra step. > > > > rpmlint warns about this (spurious-executable-perm). But I think rpmlint > > is wrong. > > > > There are scant guidelines about this - just one oblique reference in > > a "packaging mistakes" page. There is no convincing explanation I can > > find as to why including an executable script in documentation is a > > bad thing. > > They sometimes pull in additional dependencies. When they are e.g. Perl script, that's the main reason IIRC Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
