On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:05 +0100, yersinia wrote: > > Perhaps off topic. Someone know the prons/cons of scons > > http://www.scons.org/? > My first impression is that it is very similar to cmake as design > phylosophy, but use only phyton on the target system and this a plus, > IMHO. No, despite hype leading you to believe otherwise, SCons is not in the same class as autotools or CMake. SCons is only marginally better than hand-hacking makefiles. I can't recommend it. I speak from experience with the Second Life client. SCons got changed out for CMake for good reason...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
