Re: Ready for new RPM version?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 26 February 2009, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Since F-9 is still supported, isn't it a management failing to have
> > >> allowed this to happen without a plan to make mock on F-9 work?
> > >
> > > Then you're wrong:
> > > yum update rpm\* yum\*
> > > that should be about it.
> >
> > Oh?
> >
> > [tgl@rh2 ~]$ sudo yum update rpm\* yum\*
> > ...
> > Setting up Update Process
> > No Packages marked for Update
> > [tgl@rh2 ~]$
> >
> > What was stated a couple days ago was that back-porting the hash changes
> > into pre-F10 RPM versions was completely impractical.  Has that been
> > rethought?
>
> I'm sorry, I thought you had said F10. Not F9.
>
> In F10 it's available.

FWIW, I just added F-10 and its updates repos temporarily to my yum config and 
imported the F-10 GPG key on F-9 and updated rpm* and yum*.  mock is able to 
build for Rawhide again, dunno what kind of issues I'll run into when the 
next round of F-9 updates appears.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux