On Thursday 26 February 2009, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:57 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > >> Since F-9 is still supported, isn't it a management failing to have > > >> allowed this to happen without a plan to make mock on F-9 work? > > > > > > Then you're wrong: > > > yum update rpm\* yum\* > > > that should be about it. > > > > Oh? > > > > [tgl@rh2 ~]$ sudo yum update rpm\* yum\* > > ... > > Setting up Update Process > > No Packages marked for Update > > [tgl@rh2 ~]$ > > > > What was stated a couple days ago was that back-porting the hash changes > > into pre-F10 RPM versions was completely impractical. Has that been > > rethought? > > I'm sorry, I thought you had said F10. Not F9. > > In F10 it's available. FWIW, I just added F-10 and its updates repos temporarily to my yum config and imported the F-10 GPG key on F-9 and updated rpm* and yum*. mock is able to build for Rawhide again, dunno what kind of issues I'll run into when the next round of F-9 updates appears. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
