Re: autoconf and epel-5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:07:44PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
... plenty of surprises are lurking for you ;)

You really need to back your assertions up with facts.
OK, try to run autoreconf from Fedora 10 on newlib-1.15.0, gcc-3.x, firefox.

These packages end up in a total mess when doing so. There actually are plenty of such cases out there. Almost all packages which still apply autoconf < 2.59 or automake < 1.7 have such problems.

 It's pretty
pointless continuing this because you just keep making assertions that
we're wrong, but haven't shown a single fact to back it up.
Well, after ca. 10 years of being heavy auto*tools usage, having contributed to these tools as a developer, having ported and helped porting dozens of packages to modern autotools (one of these had e.g. been rpm) I know for sure you're wrong.

Feel free to trust me or to ignore me - your freedom, your decision.

Ralf


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux