Re: Status of gconf -> dconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:11 -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
> 
> Anyway, it was just an idea. I don't expect it to be suitable for
> *every* purpose. It just annoys me that people so readily discount the
> filesystem, only to just re-invent what is essentially a filesystem in
> userspace *anyway*. And re-invent it badly. How many thousands of
> man-years have gone in to researching filesystem design over the past,
> what, 40 years? How many thousands of man years has gone in to
> optimizing the Linux kernel and ext2/3/4 specifically? Do you really
> think you can do better?

Given different constraints and requirements I'd say it is probable.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux