Re: Status of gconf -> dconf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 13:47 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:

> As has been pointed out a couple of times, it's *not* always efficient
> to use the filesystem, because the filesystem usually relies on block
> sizes.  Thus you waste lots of space if your file is < 4k.

Has anyone quantified this at any point?

If 'lots of space' turns out to be 150MB, who the frick cares? I bought
a 500GB hard disk for $60. It was the smallest one they sell any more. I
bought an 8GB micro SD card - the size of a fricking fingernail - for
$50 a couple of months back. Where are we actually dealing with space
limitations any more? Not saying that there isn't somewhere, just that
we need to quantify if block sizes are actually a practical problem for
the use cases we're considering or not.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux