On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:13 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, presumably the same logic would apply to wl, then, as it's a > > kernel module containing non-free code. So either way, we would appear > > to need a consistent policy here. > > wl? The driver which started this discussion - Broadcom's proprietary driver for their wireless chipsets. It's implemented much like NVIDIA, it's a GPL-licensed wrapper around a binary blob with a proprietary-but-can-be-redistributed license. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
