On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 08:51 -0500, Michel Salim wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram > <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Michel Salim wrote: > > > >> And presumably we can't really link to fedorasolved / fedoramobile > >> either? There ought to be a policy for editing Wikis so that we don't > >> cover things where the obvious solution cannot be mentioned. > > > > Refer > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/257559/ > Aha, thanks! So we don't need to circuitously link through a > third-party website that then point back to rpmfusion. > > I'll re-update the Wiki page. Still, if it's Fedora's policy not to support non-free software, even if there's no *legal* problem with talking about a non-free driver, would it still be a *policy* problem? After all, there's nothing illegal about the proprietary NVIDIA or ATI drivers, but the Wiki doesn't talk about how to install those (as far as I can see, anyway). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
