Re: Referring to rpmfusion on Fedora project wiki?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:05 -0500, Michel Salim wrote:

> The Wiki does not talk about those, but in these cases, using
> open-source drivers lead to reduced functionality as the worst case.
> Not having functioning wi-fi, on the other hand, is a major dent in
> functionality.
> 
> I probably would not have put up the link to Broadcom at all, but the
> link has been there since before I noticed the page, so the choice is
> between:
> - removing it (and instead, only identify the chipset so people can
> search for it themselves)
> - pointing to FedoraMobile
> - pointing directly to RPMfusion

Mostly I agree, but it seems like something that should be clarified and
written down somewhere, or else it's going to be rather confusing. Is
there an existing policy on this?

And I could point out that, on my graphics card, neither nv nor nouveau
works at all. So if I don't use nvidia, I can only use vesa, which means
a) no support for my monitor's native resolution and b) terrible
performance.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux