>>>>> "MS" == Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> writes: MS> $ rpm -ql ImageMagick | grep '\.la$'|wc -l MS> 102 MS> It's an indication that hardly any reviewers/packagers follow the MS> guidelines. Very far from fair to mention ImageMagick. The issue was addressed in the ImageMagic merge review, which points back to earlier problems when the .la files were originally removed from the package. The only real sin here is the fact that it's not explicitly documented in the spec file, only mentioned in the changelog entries. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185237 "The package breaks without the .la files" is a reasonable exemption to the guidelines. It's pretty easy to see what's going on if you actually look at the merge review instead of simply accusing accusing people of blindly ignoring the guidelines. - J< -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
