On Sunday 22 February 2009 18:23:35 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Is there a set of packaging guidelines for libtool's .la files? > > > > There seems to be some inconsistency here. > > > > 1) libieee1284 and libieee1284-devel: .la files are installed by > > libieee1284-devel rpm > > > > 2) arts and arts-devel: .la files are installed by the arts rpm > > > > 3) gnutls: the spec file removes and does not install the .la files > > #3 is the policy. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Librar >ies (and no, the policy is not only for static libraries). > Are you sure it's not only for static libraries? If I understand you correctly then there should be no .la files at all? I have a lot of them: # find /usr/lib64/ | grep '\.la$' | wc -l 376 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
