On Monday 23 February 2009 10:34:12 Patrice Dumas wrote: > Given that stabilized utf8 support is quite young in TeX, I wouldn't say > the same. In any case latin1 is upstream choice, in that case. So it > is expected to have to do something for the encoding. My opinion is that > it is better to leave the document as-is and set the editor encoding, > but if the packager wants to convert the document and modify the commands > related with encoding such that the document is still valid, why not. I agree with Patrice. Notice that latin1 is quite kosher to convert to utf8 (latex-wise speaking) the problem comes for other encodings. > -- > Pat -- José Abílio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
