On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 08:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:20 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > Which is why we shouldn't have i386 repos. We should switch > > fedora-release to using $arch and an i586 repo which is a symlink to the > > i686 repo. Then when we phase out i586 in F12, we just remove the i586 > > symlink. That way, if anyone wants to maintain a build of fedora for > > i586 or lesser machines then they can do so in the i586 path using > > $arch. > > "i386" has always been our x86 offering. We haven't shipped an i386, let > alone i486 kernel in many many years, so "i386" was already a misnomer. > I have no plans to change the directory path for this release. > okay, I was just trying to make the update process easier for when i586 support goes away entirely. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
