On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:46 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, I'm for putting it in. While it may cause a couple more > > speed-bumps for the rebuild next week, it'll raise our quality in the > > long run and therefore seems like the "right" thing to do > > Should we prepare for some sort of organized group effort to help > maintainers who get poked in the eye with failures caused by this? > Worst case, this impacts a lot of smaller python packages and it would > be nice if we could stand up a crack team of python experts to help > sort out the fallout for maintainers who get caught unprepared. > > -jef"we'll see which group I fall into. The victims..or the rescue squad"spaleta We're going to need a lot of general help over the next couple weeks as things fall out of the mass rebuild. I don't think its worth targeting anything specific, just failures in general. Proven Packagers should be ready to shine. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
