Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I don't have time to search for them right now, so just a few:
gcc (e.g. libstdc++-v3, libgomp, etc. in it)
glibc
gmp
openssl
Then fix them.
I don't think it is a bug and I'm not alone in that.
Feel free to do so - I consider this handful of packages to be broken
and abusing the autotools.
So why should I change
them, again? Because you don't like %configure passing --build?
Why should upstream projects care?
... because --build is harmful
..., if you were refusing to fix the bugs you are working around by --build.
but in reality sparc-linux is something different from sparcv9-linux
from say sparcv9v-linux
1. neither sparc-linux nor sparc9c-linux are part of Fedora.
2. sparc/sparcv9-sun-* is _the_ classic example of a multilib'ed
environment, using a multilib'ed toolchain.
sparcv9-linux is 32-bit sparc linux that can run only on 64-bit CPUs.
run ... multi-arching vs. multilibs.
multilibs can be used on arbitrary hosts.
We aren't going to make i386 vs. i586 separate multilibs.
Mistake.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
