Hello, > In a nutshell: what, if anything, should we do about this? I believe the right answer is: > Just leave it up to config.guess upstream like it is now, case closed, Random comments: > My reading of http://sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_17.html is > that the manufacturer part of the configuration name is the manufacturer > of the CPU, not "OS vendor" so the former "redhat" was always incorrect. Agreed. > [...], people occasionally think the "unknown" (or "pc" for that > matter) is a bug. OTOH, I always thought the "redhat" was a bug, and a grinned a bit about it, but never cared to articulate my opinion. So I'm glad that glitch is gone now. > [...] why it was then dropped later on. Perhaps people were not aware that removing the copying from %configure means rubbing out the redhat stamp. I always thought that that code is just copying a hopefully-newer and hopefully-more-up-to-date copy of config.{guess,sub}. And when I joyfully danced celebrating that this silly thing was removed from %configure, I thought it has been just a cruft with almost no effect. Happy hacking, Stepan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
