On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:40:14PM -1000, David Cantrell wrote: > I've packaged up the calendar(1) command from OpenBSD and created a > review request: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485853 > > Warren Togami reviewed it but raised an issue about the name of the > actual command. The concern is that the name might be too generic and > could possibly collide with something else. > > The executable is /usr/bin/calendar, as taken from OpenBSD. > > If you have any reservations about the executable being named > /usr/bin/calendar, reply here or post in the review request. So who gets to decide what 'too generic' means ? We already have an even more generic command 'cal'. If 'calendar' doesn't clash with anything else in Fedora, then leave it alone. If name clashing is a real problem then the upstream project should decide how/what to rename it too. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
