On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 20:42 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Er...I might not have thought this through enough but the reason I > brought this up on IRC the other day was that I'm not convinced this > won't be equivalent if you're changing the arch and compiler out > underneath. Where will the i586 versions of those packages be to > bootstrap with? I don't believe any library paths are changing, lib/ isn't suddenly becoming lib586/. We've had i586 builds going for a day or so now, with no fallout yet. Of course, if fallout is discovered before the script starts, we can make some decisions then. Until then... > And what will happen when something wants a static > library file to link against? This one is a little bit more interesting, perhaps everything that is static should get a second rebuild pass. Of course, now I'm going to want a good programmatic way of discovering what is statically compiled, preferably without having to look at the binaries themselves. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
