On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 17:25 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 20:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > That description of the auto rebuild process makes it sound like the > > script will take no account of package dependencies, but will just try > > to rebuild things in a random order. Please tell us it ain't so. > > Ordered rebuilds generally only are necessary when bumping sonames or > otherwise bootstrapping items. Given that neither of those apply for > this rebuild, effort spent trying to order and chain builds would be > effort wasted. Er...I might not have thought this through enough but the reason I brought this up on IRC the other day was that I'm not convinced this won't be equivalent if you're changing the arch and compiler out underneath. Where will the i586 versions of those packages be to bootstrap with? And what will happen when something wants a static library file to link against? Jon. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
