On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:47:25AM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Olivier Galibert (galibert@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > stable, but the things on top of it...). Dumping something as > > cost-less as OSS for cosmetic reasons just means you don't care about > > compatibility or users in general. Which wouldn't be a first for > > Fedora, mind you. > > Notwithstanding whether or not it should be removed, an ABI feature > that *breaks* other applications when used can't really be described > as 'cost-less'. You're going into /bin/rm -rf * territory there. As in "doctor, it hurts when I do that". OG. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
