Olivier Galibert (galibert@xxxxxxxxx) said: > stable, but the things on top of it...). Dumping something as > cost-less as OSS for cosmetic reasons just means you don't care about > compatibility or users in general. Which wouldn't be a first for > Fedora, mind you. Notwithstanding whether or not it should be removed, an ABI feature that *breaks* other applications when used can't really be described as 'cost-less'. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
