Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 04:11:20PM +0100, Milos Jakubicek wrote:
If we fix a package, are we supposed to perform a normal (i.e. not
scratch) build into dist-f11-gcc44 (and/or dist-f11)? Or should we just
tag and let it be (for a new mass rebuild)?
Either just tag, or tag and build into dist-f11.
Jakub
OK, I'm sorry for bothering you once more, but there is one of my
packages left I'm not able to fix, could you have a look at it, please?
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1107170&name=build.log
The SRPM used for it:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/boinc/boinc-client-6.4.5-4.20081217svn.fc11.src.rpm
Details:
It doesn't seem to me that the problem is just because there is a
protected variable used from a non-inheriting class (as this would be a
problem in gcc 4.3 too), but anyway I tried to add the necessary
inheritance (see patch4) -- it didn't help anyway, so it was probably a
wrong idea and I don't know what to do more, sorry :(
Thanks a lot for any hint,
Milos
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
