Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126 with gcc-4.4.0-0.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!

In the past few days I've done a mass rebuild of rawhide-20090126
in mock with gcc-4.4.0-0.9 (and corresponding libtool).
6228 packages were successfully built, for the rest I've tried
to rebuild them also with gcc-4.3.2-7 (though I ran out of time,
so a couple of packages weren't attempted with 4.3).

If we fix a package, are we supposed to perform a normal (i.e. not scratch) build into dist-f11-gcc44 (and/or dist-f11)? Or should we just tag and let it be (for a new mass rebuild)?

Regards,
Milos Jakubicek

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux