Le Jeu 5 février 2009 15:09, Tom \"spot\" Callaway a écrit :
> So, this is outside the scope of the example, which assumes (for
> better
> or worse), that %{_datadir}/Foo is owned by something that both Emu
> and
> Llama depend on. If no such package existed, then yes, there should be
> another entry to cover the ownership of %{_datadir}/Foo.
But can this entry be added even though such a package *may* exist?
--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
