On 2009-02-05 at 4:41:41 -0500, Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway schrieb:
>> Yes, it would, but that's not quite right. The accurate example for the
>> guideline case would be:
>>
>> %files Emu
>> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
>> %{_datadir}/Foo/Animal/Emu
>> %dir %{_datadir}/Foo/Animal/
>>
>> %files Llama
>> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
>> %{_datadir}/Foo/Animal/Llama
>> %dir %{_datadir}/Foo/Animal/
>
> Shouldn't there be another
>
> %dir %{_datadir}/Foo
>
> or will that be inferred by rpm?
So, this is outside the scope of the example, which assumes (for better
or worse), that %{_datadir}/Foo is owned by something that both Emu and
Llama depend on. If no such package existed, then yes, there should be
another entry to cover the ownership of %{_datadir}/Foo.
~spot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
