Re: Features/ArchitectureSupport - changing what we build for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler wrote:
I wrote:
But our live images are already heavily size-constrained. There's
definitely no room for multiple kernels on the KDE live image, and I don't
think the GNOME image has any room left either.

And I'll add to this that I think the real solution is to make the x86_64
image the default download and the 32-bit image a separate link (maybe
marketed primarily for netbooks). Most computers these days are 64-bit
capable. (Almost all the new non-netbook computers are.)

Most *new* (non-netbook) hardware, sure. What about existing hardware? Both my home machines are still 32-bit (one is not even 1 GHz CPU!).

Running 32-bit
userspace on a 64-bit kernel is just a kludge, we should be promoting pure
64-bit instead.

Didn't we just have the "32-bit is actually faster" discussion? Okay, not true for x86, but the above statement still isn't entirely accurate.

That said, I do agree that running i686 on an x86_64 is a bit silly :-).

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
We interrupt this e-mail to bring you a lame signature attempting to be witty.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux