Re: Too many unowned directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> BTW, I could simplify the multi-font spec template a lot if having
> multiple subpackages own the same font directory was accepted.

Uh, this is already allowed by the guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
> Although the rule of thumb is the same: own all the directories you create
> but none of the directories of packages you depend on, there are several
> instances where it's desirable for multiple packages to own a directory.
And then it gives 2 examples. Example 2 sounds a lot like the situation with
those font subpackages.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux