On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:43:47PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:11:30 +0000, Richard wrote: > > Why can't RPM deal with it? > > Because it doesn't do it yet? ;) > Perhaps it's not even easy to implement in RPM's current code base? Sure thing. We should file a bug (feature enhancement really) against RPM and then forget about the unowned directories thing until that bug has been resolved one way or another. I don't know if you agree with me, but I think the _right_ way to solve this is once in RPM, not 48235 times over in all the packages in Fedora. Even if the RPM implementation is a bit tricky, it's surely easier than pushing this job down to every packager. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
